190 pound case, last Warning for Examination in Court Lawyer

190 pound case: The hearing started at 10 am and was adjourned for an hour. The assistant counsel later told the court that the elder lawyers were on their way and would reach shortly. After the lawyers did not arrive, the court judge delayed the hearing till July 30.

The Accountability Court Judge has issued a final warning for the re-examination of the spectators in the 190 million pound case. The lawyers did not appear, and suspended the hearing of the reference till July 30.

Held the 190 million pounds scandal reference hearing in front of Judge Muhammad Ali Waraich of the Responsibility Court. In which Speaker Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly Babar Saleem also reached Adiala Jail.

Founder PTI Imran Khan’s friend British citizen Charles Glass, his sisters Aleema Khan, and others also reached Adiala Jail.

During the hearing of the 190 million pounds reference against founder PTI and his wife Bushra Bibi, the lawyers did not appear in court.

Hearing of the 190 Million Pound Scandal Reference:

Assistant lawyer Khalid Yusuf Chaudhry told the court at 11 o’clock that senior lawyers are on their way and will arrive shortly. However, the court gave the final warning to the lawyers to cross-examine the witnesses.

Accountability Court Judge Mohammad Ali Waraich left Adiala Jail and adjourned the hearing of the case till July 30.

Note that at the last hearing, Judge Muhammad Ali Waraich of the Special Responsibility Court of Islamabad. Cross-examined former federal minister Zubaydah Jalal. The key witness in the Al-Qadir Trust reference based on the 190 million pound economic scandal. Against the former chairman of Tehreek-e-Insaf and his wife Bushra Bibi. After completing the cross-examination, the court adjourned the hearing of the reference.

So far, the statements of 34 witnesses have been recorded in the reference, while the lawyers of the respondent have also completed the cross-examination of 33 witnesses. Chief Minister Pervez Khattak, while amending the record before the court, demanded the court to make his amended statement a part of the record.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *